It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.
Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
The period has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.
Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a complete entity.
In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to scrub African American heritage and experience from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.
Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”
Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.
However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.
So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.
Elara is a productivity coach and writer passionate about helping others optimize their workflows through smart note-taking techniques.